You are looking at : Germany EuropeGermany 311 data centers · edition ofJuly 19, 2026

Fleet figures

What public data says about data centers, aggregated site by site. Every figure is dated, sourced and recomputable.

The figure of this edition — on the selected territory

39%

of sites sit in a basin under high water stress or water crisis.

The fleet is here. The water is already under stress.

WRI Aqueduct 4.0 · n = 310 · Germany · July 19, 2026 · v0.1.0

You are looking at

Germany

ⓘ This is not a ranking. It is the photograph of a territory: what it already hosts, what it can still absorb, and what public files actually allow to know.

1. Can you still build here?

The fleet was built on land already taken — but part of the fleet draws from basins already under stress.

39%

of sites sit in a basin under high water stress or water crisis.

What it meansCooling choices become a territorial question, not only a technical one.

WRI Aqueduct 4.0 · n = 310 · 1 site with no published value — excluded and counted apart Germany

95%

of the fleet is built on already-artificialized soil — not on farmland or natural land.

What it meansThe fleet grows mostly on already-transformed land — not every new project follows that logic.

Corine Land Cover (EEA) · n = 311 Germany

All the figures (1 more)

20%

of sites border a protected natural area, within one kilometre.

Protected areas — EEA CDDA / Natura 2000 · n = 311 Germany

2. What do we really know about the projects?

Operators disclose their capacity.

0%

of sites disclose their electrical capacity — the basic figure of any public debate.

What it meansThe basic figure of any public debate is usually available.

Operators' public disclosures · n = 311 Germany

3. Where is the fleet heading?

The tracked fleet is already running.

100%

of the tracked fleet is already operating — we measure what exists, not only what is promised.

What it meansWe measure what exists first, not only what is promised.

ScoreMyDataCenter corpus — project status · n = 311 Germany

5

projects under citizen opposition or moratorium — recorded and sourced, never graded on that basis.

What it meansSourced facts, never a grade — context.

Watch layer — sourced facts, never a grade · n = 5 Germany

4. What weighs most here?

The territory's constraints, ranked by the share of sites concerned — a descriptive ranking, never a grade.

1

Water

39%

of sites in high water-stress areas.

2

Protected areas

20%

of sites within 1 km of a protected natural area.

recomputed per perimeter: share of sites concerned by each constraint

5. Three projects that tell this territory

A mechanical, published selection — the most common profile, the most constrained, the best documented. Real situations behind the aggregates.

The most common profile

ITENOS Frankfurt (FRA2) — Frankfurt am Main (HE)

Site gradeD
  • Operational · capacity not disclosed
  • On already-artificialized soil

criterion: the territory's modal profile (status, grid, soil, most frequent grade)

View the fiche →
The most constrained

Arelion Stuttgart SGRT/Z — Stuttgart (BW)

Site gradeD
  • 2 cumulated territorial constraints
  • In a high water-stress area
  • Within 1 km of a protected area

criterion: highest cumulated territorial frictions in the perimeter

View the fiche →
The best documented

1&1 Versatel Telehaus Münster — Münster (NW)

Site gradeC
  • Documentary confidence: low — 31%
  • Operational

criterion: highest documentary-confidence score

View the fiche →

6. How to read these figures?

No figure on this page is written by hand.

311sites analysed one by one23%average coverage — the gap is displayed100%recomputable (open data, grid and engine)1same method for every territory100%of figures linked to their sources

Figures change when facts change — never to fit the story.

See the full method →
ScoreMyDataCenter is an independent observatory. No operator funding. No proprietary data. No complacency.